- Discussion at the 15th TPT-WG
The Transparency Exercise
Questionnaire is aimed at Transparency on member economies international shipping
policies and activities. Aiming at this objective, Japan proposed that Maritime Initiative
members would analyze the responses to TEQ by themselves. The purpose was to enlarge
knowledge of the responses and to foster mutual understanding between member economies.
Maritime Initiative
discussed this proposal in the last meeting in the 15th TPT-WG, and agreed that
the analysis work would be done in the forthcoming meetings. It was also noted that this
work would be linked to the TILF project "Facilitation of International
Shipping" which was proposed by Australia and approved by the meeting.
This TILF project is
scheduled to be completed by April 2001. The result of this project could be used to
supplement the result of our self analysis of TEQ responses.
Therefore, we also agreed
that the self analysis of TEQ responses in the MI meeting would be discussed in the next
three meetings so that the analysis work could be finished by April 2001 coincidentally
with the TILF project.
- The analysis method agreed at the 15th TPT-WG
The analysis work would
be implemented by economies on their own initiative, shared on sector by sector basis
among the economies.
It is sectoral in a sense
of selecting some sectors to be analyzed by a analyst economy, but comprehensive in a
sense of dealing all responses from member economies within the work of an analyst
economy. Basically based on the responses of TEQ, an analyst economy would probably
extract policy alternatives from the TEQ responses, and put forward its opinions. But an
analysis must not mention a particular name of economy.
For the sectors to be
analyzed, the questions in the TEQ were categorized into four sectors;
- Market Access ( Question item 9 in TEQ )
- Support Measures( Item 11 )
- Competition Law ( Item 12 )
- General Maritime Policy ( Items 3,4,6,7,8
and 10)
Following the methodology
above, an analysis will be as a following table. But it is strongly underlined that this
analysis work is done by voluntary offers of economies and can accept some extent of
flexibility in the format.
Example:
Analysis of TEQ responses ( Support Measures ( Question item 11) )
This document is
prepared for discussion at the MI meeting by sorted out economies responses to Item 11 of
TEQ. Further analysis would be possible as a result of the discussion.
1 General remarks:.....
2 Measures
- Type A Support for construction cost of
shipbuilders
(a) limited for vessels
gained by domestic operators
.........
(b) open for any operators
.........
(c) .........
Remarks:.......
- Type B Subsidy for vessels
(a) ........
(b) .......
Remarks:........
- Type C Finance for purchase of vessels
............
- Type D Subsidy for R&D expenditure
..........
- .........
3 Possible Future Action
............. |
3. Allotment of analysis
work
Allotment of an analyst
economy depends on voluntary offers. Australia has offered to analyze Competition Law
sector, and U.S. has also offered analysis of Market Access sector. Offers for a same
sector are welcomed , because plural analysis on one sector are useful for comparison and
deeper understanding of the sector.
This page was last updated on 1 Feb, 2008 |