|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seamless Passenger
Flow Survey Results FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Canada
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .... 1PHYSICAL IMPEDIMENTS ... 2 INSTITUTIONAL IMPEDIMENTS ..........7 REGULATORY IMPEDIMENTS ... 11 CONCLUSION ............15 APPENDIX A Table of Summary Results
INTRODUCTION The Transportation Working Group, and the APEC Intermodal Task Force (ITF), have undertaken projects to further develop intermodal transportation within the APEC region. However, it has been noted that much of this work focused on intermodal freight transportation and more information was needed on intermodal passenger transportation. To alleviate this concern, Canada, on behalf of the ITF, developed a seamless passenger flow questionnaire in an effort to gain further information on the impediments to the flow of intermodal passenger travel within the Asia-Pacific region and to identify potential Best practices i.e. travel that would include at least one segment of the trip which was international in scope. While the purpose of the questionnaire was to identify constraints to intermodal passenger travel and possible solutions, it was in no way intended to address the question of implementation which would be left to each economy. In order to focus the discussion on barriers to intermodal passenger travel, the questionnaire was divided into three parts to correspond to those major areas covered in the Congestion Points Study i.e. physical, institutional, and regulatory impediments. Each of these three parts included a section covering: impediments, obstacles, or barriers to the seamless flow of intermodal passenger travel; an assessment of the relative impact of these barriers; reasons why these impediments exist; and, suggested solutions to overcome these obstacles. Survey Results The response to the questionnaire by APEC economies was very encouraging. A total of thirteen economies from representative areas of the APEC region responded to the survey. The time and effort which each economy put into completing these questionnaires is much appreciated. In responding to the questionnaire, each economy rated the relative of impact of a given impediment to passenger flow on a scale of 1 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). In order to consolidate the range of responses, a Table has been created to summarize the questionnaires findings (see Appendix A). The results of these ratings were then placed into one of three categories (1-3 indicating low impact; 4-6 indicating medium impact; and, 7-10 indicating high impact). The number of responses in a given category were then added together to provide a total for each level of impact. Given the detail provided in the responses to each questionnaire, for ease of discussion, only those impediments which were rated as medium or high impact to intermodal passenger flows are presented in this Summary Report.
PHYSICAL IMPEDIMENTS Access Route Congestion
Note: Numbers above represent economy responses per level of impact The problem of Access Route Congestion was viewed as a significant impact on the seamless flow of intermodal passenger travel. Key reasons given for this congestion included:
Intermodal Congestion
The problem of intermodal connection was also viewed as a significant impediment to the seamless flow of intermodal passenger travel. Some key reasons provided by member economies are found below:
Incompatible Technology and Equipment
Most economies did not find that incompatible technology and equipment were major barriers to the flow of intermodal passenger transportation. In fact, only two economies indicated that it was a barrier with medium impact. Some key reasons cited in this area included:
Lack of Alternate Modes
Respondents found this to be somewhat significant barrier to seamless intermodal passenger flows. Key reasons cited were as follows:
Incomplete Information
Several economies considered the problem of incomplete information a fairly significant impediment to the seamless flow of intermodal passenger travel. Some key reasons identified include:
Other: Lack of Full Road Pricing One economy found this impediment to be very important and rated its impact as 10 (maximum).
INSTITUTIONAL IMPEDIMENTS Uncoordinated Scheduling
While half of the respondents considered this impediment to have a low impact on intermodal connections, the other respondents considered it to have a medium or high impact on intermodal passenger travel. Key reasons provided included:
Incompatible Ticket Reservations
As seen above, incompatible ticket reservations were seen as a significant barrier to seamless intermodal passenger travel. Key reasons for this included:
Uncoordinated System Planning
Economies were essentially evenly divided regarding the impact of uncoordinated system planning on intermodal passenger flows. Key reasons cited included:
Lack of Standardized Performance Criteria
The lack of standardized performance criteria was largely viewed as having low to medium impact on intermodal passenger travel. Those respondents who identified this as a barriers cited the following key reasons:
Unclear Responsibility/Accountability
Respondents provided a variety of reasons for identifying the above impediment as a barrier to intermodal passenger travel. Key reasons provided included:
REGULATORY IMPEDIMENTS
Variable Security Requirements
Few economies found this impediment to be a significant barrier to intermodal passenger travel. Those that did, cited:
Customs Clearance Procedures
Once again, few respondents found customs clearance procedures to be a significant impediment to intermodal passenger travel. Those that did, cited:
Immigration Procedures
As seen above, only one economy suggested that immigration procedures were a barrier to intermodal passenger flows. They cited:
Environmental Compliance Requirements
Environmental compliance was viewed by respondents largely to be a limited impediment to intermodal passenger travel. Those that did view it as a problem cited:
Variable Safety Requirements
Most economies viewed variable safety requirements as having little impact on intermodal passenger travel. Those respondents which did have concerns cited:
Other: Access for the Physically Challenged One economy considered the lack of access for the physically challenged to have a high impact on intermodal passenger travel. The reasons highlighted included:
CONCLUSION In examining different economys responses to the questionnaire, certain reasons for impediments to intermodal passenger travel tended to surface over and over again. Those included: lack of funding; inadequate or uncoordinated transportation planning; lack of infrastructure; competing priorities; and, insufficient information. Overcoming scarce funding was cited by most economies as key to improving various aspects of intermodal passenger travel (although developing infrastructure was highlighted more often). Possible solutions to inadequate funding included: initiating partnerships between the public and private sector; earmarking funding for transportation in government budgets; and lastly, increasing the flexibility of funding disbursements. The problem of inadequate or uncoordinated transportation planning was particularly prevalent when respondents dealt with institutional impediments. This problem also arose under regulatory impediments. Common suggested solutions included developing economy wide or regional planning committees to include all levels of government as well as public and private operators. Whatever the vehicle, the key seemed to be to get all of the affected parties involved early in the planning process and to encourage extensive communications. Lack of infrastructure, while more a problem for some economies than others, was still prevalent throughout the responses - particularly those regarding physical impediments. Although the solution to this problem may appear obvious, the barriers to developing or improving infrastructure were viewed as significant. Solutions suggested focused on increased funding and greater land appropriation. The problem of competing priorities was particularly evident for those impediments that involved more than one level of government, or competing public and private operators. This dilemma was especially difficult to solve with most economies calling for an increased role of government or the creation of a transportation body to oversee and possibly regulate the competing sides. Finally, the issue of insufficient information was cited as a barrier to travel for everything from customs clearance procedures to environmental compliance. A variety of creative solutions were suggested to overcome this problem, ranging from utilizing the Internet to the more personal interaction of a manned table for questions. Also, respondents considered the problem from different angles and also suggested including the relevant information in transportation training programs. All of these problems and many more were identified by those economies who responded to the questionnaire. What is remarkable is not the number of barriers to intermodal passenger travel but the creativity and thoughtfulness put into developing solutions to overcome those barriers. Further discussion of the findings of this questionnaire will augment the work many economies have already undertaken, and could lead to other possible solutions from which all economies may benefit. Summary Table For Seamless Passenger Flow Survey
|
This page was last updated on 12 March, 2008
![]()
This site is best viewed
with Internet Explorer or
Netscape version 4.0 or higher at 800 *
600